The ask of whether Europeans migrated to the Americas past in period has been a longstanding argument. In fact, for complete 200 years scholars have asked whether primeval Europeans perhaps migrated to the Americas preceding to Columbus' exploit. For example, by 1891 a noise entitled America Not Discovered by Columbus, by Rasmus B. Anderson, restrained a listing beside whatever 350 sources on the content. It listed claims of America's deed by Chinese, Arabs, Welsh, Venetians, Portuguese, and Poles. However, the majority of the references verified the impression of Vikings as the firstborn Old World perceptiveness unit to conquer the Americas.
This proposal was unchangeable in 1960 when Norse rubble at L'Anse aux Meadows on the northern tip of Newfoundland were found by Helge Ingstad. More recently respective sites and lines of evidence have been cited as following an even earlier move of Europeans into the Americas. This hypothesis, named the Solutrean hypothesis, postulates that Upper Palaeolithic peoples from Europe utilizing Solutrean metallic element practical application migrated into the Americas during the overdue Pleistocene. Evidence supporting such an argument, however, waste elusive and highly controversial, first and foremost because the Solutrean done in Europe at slightest 5,000 eld back the primary metal practical application appeared in the Americas. Likewise, archaeological, craniomorphological, and transmissible demonstration argues antagonistic any pre-Columbus European settlements in the Americas that lasted more than than a few seasons. For a more indepth dialogue of the prehistoric culture of the Americas and the perceptiveness relationship of American Indians to opposite groups, I suggest you ask my narrative "Respect for the Ancestors: American Indian Cultural Affiliation in the American West" (Bauu Press, 2005).